RetailCo was significantly adversely impacted by decreases in foot-traffic and closed its stores on 15 March 2020. Economic and regulatory circumstances changed on 30 June 2020 such that RetailCo wished to reopen its stores, however the significant period of time with no cash inflow resulted in insufficient working capital to meet its lease obligations. The ICAEW Library & Information Service provides full text access to a selection of key business and reference eBooks from leading publishers. EBooks are available to logged-in ICAEW members, ACA students and other entitled users. If you are unable to access an eBook, please see our Help and support advice or contact The IFRS Foundation is a not-for-profit, public interest organisation established to develop high-quality, understandable, enforceable and globally accepted accounting and sustainability disclosure standards.
The presentation of government grants is dependent on whether it is a grant related to income or a grant related to assets. Whilst government grants are more common in the form of income, there is potential that entities could receive grants related to the purchase, acquisition or construction of assets. If this circumstance exists, one could argue the subsidy should be spread over the term of the loan as an interest adjustment. Government what is grant accounting grants related to assets, including non-monetary grants at fair value, are presented in the statement of financial position either by setting up the grant as deferred income or by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of the asset. Government grants are transfers of resources to an entity by government in return for past or future compliance with certain conditions relating to the operating activities of the entity.
The amount of promises to give that do not yet meet all conditions for revenue recognition must be disclosed. For example, if a grant stipulates reimbursing costs incurred over a 3 year project period, any promised amounts not yet earned should be disclosed in the footnotes. Promises from government entities should be evaluated to determine if they are enforceable and measurable under FAS 116 guidance. Conditional promises to give are recognized when conditions are substantially met. In both cases, the grant funds cannot be recognized until the conditions in the grant agreement are met.
Examples of such benefits are income tax holidays, investment tax credits, accelerated depreciation allowances and reduced income tax rates.’ (IAS 20.2(b)). IFRS has specific requirements for government grants that apply to all entities; US GAAP has limited guidance for ‘business entities’. “Government Grants are assistant by government in the form of transfers of resources to an entity in return for past or future compliance with certain conditions relating to the operating activities of the entity. They exclude those forms of government assistance which cannot reasonably have a value placed upon them and transactions with government which cannot be distinguished from the normal trading transaction of the entity”. Both methods are regarded as acceptable for the presentation of grants related to income. Disclosure of the grant may be necessary for a proper understanding of the financial statements.
A corresponding financial liability is recognized for the amount of the repayment. Unlike IFRS, US GAAP has specialized industry accounting requirements for not-for-profit entities (NFPs) that receive government grants. For other (business) entities, US GAAP does not contain specific guidance on the accounting for government grants. Consistent with historical practice, business entities might look to IAS 20 as a source of nonauthoritative guidance, or they might apply the US GAAP contribution accounting model in the Contributions Received Subsections of ASC 958 for NFPs. The accounting for government grants and any relevant disclosures of any government assistances are covered in IAS 20 – Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistence.
An example of assistance that cannot be distinguished from the normal trading transactions of the entity is a government procurement policy that is responsible for a portion of the entity’s sales. The existence of the benefit might be unquestioned but any attempt to segregate the trading activities from government assistance could well be arbitrary. A government grant may take the form of a transfer of a non‑monetary asset, such as land or other resources, for the use of the entity. In these circumstances it is usual to assess the fair value of the non‑monetary asset and to account for both grant and asset at that fair value. An alternative course that is sometimes followed is to record both asset and grant at a nominal amount.
Comments are closed